LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NON COMPLIANCE WITH BID REQUIREMENTS

Peter Volmink

Abstract


It is a universally accepted principle of public procurement that bids which do not meet the minimum requirements as stipulated in a bid document are to be regarded as non-responsive and rejected without further consideration. This general principle is subject to certain recognised exceptions. However, the danger always exists that organs of state may apply this rule in a rigid and mechanical fashion or worse, as a means to manipulate the outcome of a tender process. For this reason, the disqualification of bidders on grounds of non-responsiveness has generated a considerable amount of litigation in South Africa. In two recent judgments, the Constitutional Court laid down a framework within which the courts should evaluate the legal effect of bid irregularities. Briefly, the requirement of responsiveness operates in the following manner: a bid only qualifies as a responsive bid if it meets with all requirements as set out in the bid document. Bid requirements usually relate to compliance with regulatory prescripts, bid formalities, or functionality/technical, pricing and empowerment requirements. The standard practice in the public sector is that bids are first evaluated for compliance with responsiveness criteria before being evaluated for compliance with other criteria, such as functionality, pricing or empowerment.  Bidders found to be non-responsive are excluded from the bid process regardless of the merits of their bids. Responsiveness thus serves as an important first hurdle for bidders to overcome.  But how should administrative bodies approach the issue of non-compliance with bid requirements?  How can administrative bodies avoid the twin ills of adopting an overly rigid and mechanical approach on the one hand and disregarding the clear and mandatory prescripts of a tender document on the other? Can an organ of state condone non-compliance with mandatory bid requirements? What are the factors to be considered when deciding whether a bid is responsive or not? These are among the questions which this paper seeks to address.


Keywords


public procurement, non-responsive bids

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.14803/1-1-4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2411-7048 (online)

Powered by OJS and hosted by since 2014.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help