https://applj.journals.ac.za/pub <p>The <strong>African Public Procurement Law Journal</strong> was established to stimulate and foster academic engagement and debate in the field of public procurement law and regulation on the African continent. The Journal is the first platform devoted exclusively to research into public procurement law in Africa and will be published online by the African Procurement Law Unit of the Faculty of Law, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Journal will publish articles continuously on its website and consolidate all contributions in two editions per year. The Journal will publish high quality papers on themes and sub-themes relevant to procurement law and regulation in Africa. The Journal intends to make widely accessible, information on African public procurement law, regulation and policy and provide readers with scholarly and in-depth analysis on the same. The Journal is aimed at a diverse audience of academics, practitioners, regulators, policy makers, government officials and students.&nbsp;</p> African Procurement Law Unit (APLU) en-US African Public Procurement Law Journal 2411-7048 <p><span>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</span></p><ul><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li></ul><br /><ul><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li></ul><br /><ul><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li></ul> https://applj.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/75 <p>The Public Procurement Act 28 of 2024 introduces a comprehensive overhaul of South Africa’s public procurement system, requiring all organs of state to revise their procurement frameworks. This includes those bodies in South Africa’s security sector, comprising, among others, the South African National Defence Force, the South African Police Service, the State Security Agency, and the Border Management Authority. However, the procurement activities of the security sector occur within specialised regulatory environments, strict command hierarchies and contexts involving security-sensitive information. This raises crucial questions about whether the newly established Public Procurement Tribunal’s regulatory framework is suitable to adjudicate procurement disputes involving the security sector.</p> <p>This paper examines the Tribunal’s capacity to address the legal, operational and national-security complexities inherent in security-sector procurement, given that the Act requires Tribunal hearings to be conducted in public and restricts panel membership to Tribunal members only.</p> <p>The analysis identifies substantial challenges, including risks to national security, difficulties in managing disputes involving sensitive operations and limitations in accessing specialised expertise. It further highlights tensions between the PPA and other legislation governing security institutions. The paper concludes that a sector-specific approach – incorporating clearer mechanisms for confidentiality, expert involvement and better alignment with existing security legislation – is essential for ensuring that the Tribunal functions effectively within the security procurement landscape.</p> Ernst Heydenrych Moses Khanyile Copyright (c) 2026 Ernst Heydenrych, Moses Khanyile 2026-04-14 2026-04-14 13 1 1 24 10.14803/13-1-75